金标尺教师APP
考教师 金标尺
请使用微信扫描二维码,登录金标尺教师
成功弹窗点击
失败弹窗点击
警告弹窗点击
提示弹窗点击
【根据材料,回答第 115-119 题】
After earning a bachelor’s degree, I was determined to do what I love. I headed straight to graduate school to pursue a doctorate.
For almost a decade, I told everyone I encountered that they should do the same. “Follow your passion,” I counseled. “You can figure out the employment stuff later.”
It wasn’t until I began to research this widely accepted career advice that I understood how problematic it really was.
As a sociologist, I interviewed college students and professional workers to learn what it really meant to pursue their dreams, which I will refer to here as the passion principle. I was stunned by what I found out about this principle in the research for my new book.
Surveys show the American public has long held the passion principle in high regard as a career decision-making priority. And its popularity is even stronger among those facing job instability.
Advocates of the passion principle found it compelling because they believed that following one’s passion can provide workers with both the motivation necessary to work hard and a place to find fulfillment.
Yet, what I found is that following one’s passion does not necessarily lead to fulfillment, but is one of the most powerful cultural forces perpetuating overwork. I also found that promoting the pursuit of one’s passion helps perpetuate social inequalities due to the fact that not everyone has the same economic resources to allow them to pursue their passion with ease.
While the passion principle is broadly popular, not everyone has the necessary resources to turn their passion into a stable, good-paying job. Passion-seekers from wealthy families are better able to wait until a job they are passionate about comes along without worrying about student loans in the meantime. They are also better situated to take unpaid internships to get their foot in the door while their parents pay their rent. And they often have access to parents’ social networks to help them find jobs. Surveys revealed that working-class and first-generation college graduates, regardless of their career field, are more likely than their wealthier peers to end up in low-paying unskilled jobs when they pursue their passion.
Colleges, workplaces and career counselors who promote the “follow your passion” path for everyone, without leveling the playing field, help perpetuate socioeconomic inequalities among career aspirants.
It’s not just well-off passion-seekers who benefit from the passion principle. Employers of passionate workers do, too. Potential employers showed greater interest in passionate applicants in part because they believed the applicants would work hard at their jobs without expecting an increase in pay. They even sacrifice a good salary, job stability and leisure time to work in a job they love.
A
Willingness to take unpaid internships and low-paying jobs.
B
Full academic preparedness and sound career counseling.
C
Hard work and sacrifice of leisure time.
D
Financial backing and social connections.
正确答案 :D
解析
英语阅读题。
【题干翻译】将热情转化为稳定高薪工作,重要的因素是什么?
A.愿意接受无薪实习和低薪工作。
B.充分的学术准备和合理的职业指导。
C.努力工作和牺牲休闲时间。
D.经济支持和社会关系。
【定位】根据题干信息词“turning one’s passion into a stable,good-paying job”可将答案线索定位于倒数第三段。
【分析】倒数第三段通过对比说明:富裕家庭的孩子能依靠“父母支付房租(经济支持)”“利用父母的社交网络”(社会关系)来实现职业转化,而普通家庭的孩子缺乏这些资源。D项“经济支持和社会关系”全面概括了这些关键要素,故为正确答案。A项是弱势群体的被迫选择,而非获得稳定高薪工作的条件。B项中的“学术准备”原文未提及。C项是热情求职者常常会做的事情,而非获得稳定高薪工作的条件。
故本题答案为D项。
相关试题
有3堆松果,分别有117、137、147个。松鼠将松果从一堆搬运到另一堆称为1次搬运,每次最多搬运6个松果,且每次搬运时都会吃掉其中1个。要使3堆松果一样多,松鼠至少要搬运( )次。
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性( )。[img=23038935569.png]
GDP是衡量一国经济总量的重要指标,以下关于GDP的说法,正确的是()。
甲、乙、丙、丁四所学校组织学生进行了联谊赛。甲学校派出的人数是全体人数的1/3,乙学校派出的人数是全体人数的1/4,丙学校派出的人数是全体人数的1/5,丁学校派出了39名学生。此次联谊赛共有( )名学生参加。
下列选项中,不能从上述资料中推出的是()。
More than half of people interviewed admitted to avoiding wines _______ they could not pronounce.
如果边际消费倾向为0.8,则政府购买乘数为()。
What does the U.S. secretary of education say in his open letter?
0,30,78,60,20,( )。
What do the authors believe concerning unexcused school absences?
以下哪项不属于商业银行的中间业务( )。
某公司今年新入职了赵、钱、孙、李、周、吴六名新员工,其中高级工程师1人,中级工程师2人,低级工程师3人,2名为本土员工,4名为外籍员工。已知:(1)钱、李两人国籍相同,孙、吴两人国籍不同;(2)赵、吴两人职称相同,钱、孙、周三人职称各不相同。根据上述信息,可以得出以下哪项?( )